Skip to main content

Eventos pasados

Consulta en esta sección los eventos anteriores.

Imagen Seminario PePe (Políticas Públicas) - Shu Wen Ng
Activo

Seminario PePe (Políticas Públicas) - Shu Wen Ng

Dr Ng of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the United States has worked on evaluating the impact of sugary drink and food taxes for almost a decade, and has most recently been working evaluating the impact of financial incentive & subsidy programmes. She will take us through some options for pricing policies that increase the price of unhealthy beverages and foods (e.g., taxation, tariffs) or to decrease the price of healthier beverages and foods (e.g., subsidies, cash transfers) in order to improve diets. She will set out the growing global evidence around how, when and what about these policies seem to work ‘better’ in improving diets and longer-term health. Her talk will provide some examples from across the globe that show how these solutions may be possible. Shu Wen Ng is a health economist and Associate Professor of Nutrition at the Gillings School of Global Public Health at UNC. Her work seeks to understand individual and household-level decisions about dietary behaviors and their health impacts, accounting for the fact that decisions are constrained by monetary, time and biological factors, and are made within a broader environmental or policy context. She uses tools/approaches from economics, epidemiology, sociology and public policy, and collaborates with a mix of disciplinary experts. She is Principal and co-Investigator on several foundation and US NIH studies that use ‘big-data’ on commercial store sales, household purchase, and nutrition label data at the barcode level (scanner data), alongside dietary intake and nutrition databases and policy databases. Analyzing such data, Shu Wen has studied how policies such as taxation, subsidies, incentives, front-of-pack labels, and marketing regulations affect consumer purchases, diet, nutrition, and health outcomes across many settings, and how they can help narrow existing nutritional and health disparities. Some of her earlier model-based work contributed to the evidence behind SSB taxes in Mexico and the UK, and she has been involved in conducting the impact evaluations of such taxes in Mexico, Berkeley, South Africa. She also co-chaired the US SSB tax evaluation advisory committee and is a member of the UK NIHR funded SDIL evaluation study steering committee. She leads ongoing projects in the United States, South Africa, Jamaica, Barbados, Mexico, and supports projects in Brazil, Colombia, Chile, Peru and China. She also consults for the World Bank, Singapore’s Health Promotion Board and New York City’s Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.

12:30 pm
Zoom
Imagen Seminario PePe (políticas públicas) - Pablo Andrés Neumeyer
Activo

Seminario PePe (políticas públicas) - Pablo Andrés Neumeyer

We document the heterogeneous effect of covid-19 on health and economic outcomesin Bogot ?a and develop a quantitative dynamic general equilibrium model intertwinedwith a behavioral epidemiological model where society is divided in two groups. Peoplein high/low socioeconomic strata (SES) have a higher/lower human capital, have/notaccess to financial markets and lower/higher contact rates to shop, work, and sociallyinteract. We assess the distributional consequences of covid-19 and evaluate policiesthat restrict economic activity and re-distribute income. Restrictions on economicactivity reduce social welfare and have modest public health benefits. Re-distributivepolicies improve social welfare despite contracting economic activity and worseninghealth outcomes. In some cases, redistributive policies induce Pareto improvementsin social welfare. The positive predictions of the model are consistent with observedmacroeconomic aggregates and with epidemiological outcomes across social groups. InBogot ?a, a year into de epidemic, the prevalence ratio is two, infection fatality ratesare similar across social groups, and more disadvantaged people have a 50% higherexposure to contagion. In the model, the elasticity of consumption with respect tosocial distancing along an indifference curve at the peak of the epidemic is 2%. Thebenchmark welfare cost of the pandemic is 0.1% of steady state consumption for peoplein low SES and 1.22% for people in high SES.

02:00 pm
Zoom